General AI tools are powerful. But their answers sound confident even when they are wrong. For an architecture practice that is responsible for its drawings and supporting evidence, that is not enough.
A principle from architecture
A design is examined from many angles – in the practice, in reviews, with the specialist consultants. We apply this principle to AI.
How it works in practice
We put critical questions to several AI models from different providers. The answers are compared and the arguments weighed up.
- You see the best-argued answer.
- Contradictions between the models stay visible instead of being hidden.
- Every result names its source: drawing, regulation or document.
Why this helps your practice
Where the models agree, you gain certainty. Where they contradict each other, you know where to look more closely. Your practice makes the decision – on a better basis. This is how we set up tools, and how we build applications.